User:Aiken drum/ACE2010


 * Oppose Much too inactive lately - coming back for the drama is a little off-putting. Someone active and in touch with issues is what's needed.
 * Support A good former arb with an impressive collection of recognized content.
 * Neutral Never heard of.
 * Oppose Unfortunately, despite good content work, Fuchs seems quite immature for the role of an arbitrator.
 * Oppose Supported recent adminship request, but is inexperienced.
 * Support Highly experienced former arbitrator. Open about past problems, and I don't think there is anything to be concerned with.
 * Oppose Unfortunately, despite good content work, Fuchs seems quite immature for the role of an arbitrator.
 * Oppose Supported recent adminship request, but is inexperienced.
 * Support Highly experienced former arbitrator. Open about past problems, and I don't think there is anything to be concerned with.
 * Oppose Supported recent adminship request, but is inexperienced.
 * Support Highly experienced former arbitrator. Open about past problems, and I don't think there is anything to be concerned with.
 * Support Highly experienced former arbitrator. Open about past problems, and I don't think there is anything to be concerned with.


 * Oppose Too many poor admin decisions, without considering priorities.
 * Oppose Too many poor admin decisions, without considering priorities.


 * Oppose Too much of a drama-mongerer (such as over the ID issue in this very election). Not arbcom material. Better suited to article work.
 * Oppose Too much of a drama-mongerer (such as over the ID issue in this very election). Not arbcom material. Better suited to article work.


 * Oppose Not mature enough for this role, and not particularly active either.
 * Oppose Not mature enough for this role, and not particularly active either.


 * Support Can sometimes be blunt to the point of being insulting, but this minor issue is outweighed by their content work, knowledge of the project and someone who I know will consider both sides of a conflict fairly.
 * Support Can sometimes be blunt to the point of being insulting, but this minor issue is outweighed by their content work, knowledge of the project and someone who I know will consider both sides of a conflict fairly.


 * Support I don't like this user's beliefs on inclusionism and their stances at RFA, but they have almost always impressed me with their sense, integrity and fairness.
 * Support I don't like this user's beliefs on inclusionism and their stances at RFA, but they have almost always impressed me with their sense, integrity and fairness.


 * Support A decent enough former arbitrator with generally good sense.
 * Support A decent enough former arbitrator with generally good sense.


 * Neutral Never heard of.
 * Neutral Never heard of.


 * Support A fine arbitrator currently; I'm happy for his continued role in this area.
 * Support A fine arbitrator currently; I'm happy for his continued role in this area.


 * Oppose Far too many issues (e.g. block log) to make a good arb.
 * Oppose Far too many issues (e.g. block log) to make a good arb.


 * Neutral Never heard of.
 * Neutral Never heard of.


 * Oppose Only seen him in meta discussions and not generally been impressed.
 * Oppose Only seen him in meta discussions and not generally been impressed.


 * Oppose Unfortunately Rlevse/Sherwoodgate let this candidate down with their attack on FAC. FAC isn't perfect but it was not the cause of Rleve's plagiarism.
 * Oppose Unfortunately Rlevse/Sherwoodgate let this candidate down with their attack on FAC. FAC isn't perfect but it was not the cause of Rleve's plagiarism.


 * Neutral Uncertain.
 * Neutral Uncertain.


 * Neutral Uncertain.
 * Neutral Uncertain.


 * Support Knowledgable, fair, a good listener, unbiased and experienced.
 * Support Knowledgable, fair, a good listener, unbiased and experienced.