User:Aim9201/Sandbox/Proxemic Communication Strategies

Dimensions of Nonverbal Communication According to Xu Lin’s article on Cultural Dimensions and Conversational Strategies, “Cultural factors have a great impact on conversational techniques”, and there are two basic elements consisted in all conversations: informational and communicative. The Informational Function deals with informing another individual with information; this is known as the information focused element. Whereas, the communicative function deals with the social principle or aim in the conversation, also known as the element that deals with social relationships and drawing closer to people. Xu Lin studies the different classifications of nonverbal communication brought forth by E.T Hall (1959) created the word Proxemics which studies the communicative skills in terms of proper distance. The different dimensions brought forth by Xu Lin and Prabhu include: Intimate, Personal, Social and Public Distances. Common Methods One of the primary methods used among Kim, D., Pan, Y., & Park, H. (1998), Merkin, R. S. (2006), Albas, C. (1991) and Graves, J. R., & Robinson, J. D. included “Likert-type” measures of sampling. Participants would be given surveys, videotaped and observed while receiving responding to oral questions posed by formally dressed interviewers. Each study consisted of a controlled group and an experimental group and would measure each individual in a specific manner in order to bring forth accurate results. Each method included a sampling base of volunteers with cheap compensation such as a two dollar reward or extra credit in the class taking part in the experiment. DiBiase describes touch as differentiating depending on various aspects: All people touch and are touched by others, but there are vast differences in the amount of touching that people do. For example, touching appears to vary by gender, culture, and even age. Although these particular differences in touching behavior are not well understood, historically investigators have thought of touch as expressing control and dominance. Not only does touch vary by culture, but also age and gender. They continue to explain how some researchers have suggested that some cultures, such as Middle Eastern, Latin America and Southern Europe, could be considered high- contact cultures (interact at closer distances and touch more frequently) much more in social conversations than people from non-contact cultures, being United States of America and Northern Europe. Research from Graves (1976), and Robinson (1976) , suggests that an individual’s nonverbal behavior is capable of communication information about the particular individuals’ feelings and attitudes, regardless of the culture. However, the outcome of his research concluded that the prominent role was in fact played by nonverbal communication in determining the total meaning of the message, and that the message being conveyed could very well differ depending on the context. His discoveries included that: Within the client-counselor relationship, the consistency or inconsistency between the counselor's verbal and nonverbal behaviors has been found to be an important determinant of the client's impressions of the counselor as well as of the client's proxemics behavior. Albas (1991) studied the comfortable proxemic distances assumed by Canadian female students. The cultural group and sex was held constant; however, the comfortable distances seemed to vary from situation to situation. Preston (2005), discusses the proxemics in clinical and administrative settings. He came up with the conclusion that the proximity of people to one another when they interact and the configuration of work areas send a message that affects people in different ways. One of his main suggestions was to use observation skills in understanding how and why others interact within or outside their own space. He claims that people choose to rely on their imagination to better receive messages sent but unspoken by others spatial interactions.