User:Aimalahmadi/Computer scientist/Erdi Hida Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * User who I am reviewing: Aimalahmadi
 * Link to the sandbox where the content I am  reviewing is: User:Aimalahmadi/sandbox

Lead

 * The lead of the article will not be effected by adding this content so it does not have to be changed. The lead to the creators new section is concise and briefly covers the new content.

Content

 * Added content is relevant and up-to-date. All of the added content belongs in the article.

Tone and Balance

 * The content remains neutral with no over or under-representation.

Sources and References

 * Sources are reliable and reflect the information that is currently available on the topic of the added content. Sources show current dates and the links work.

Organization

 * The creators content does follow the rules of being concise, clear, and is easy to read with no grammatical or spelling errors. The added sections fit properly into the article.

Images and Media

 * The image added does not necessarily enhance understanding of the topic and the caption only contains the name of who is in the picture could be edited to include more information. The image is laid out to be visually appealing and adheres to copyright regulations.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

New Article Evaluation
N/A - pre-existing article

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
You'll need to change the wording and sentence structure of your added sections so that it doesn't violate Wikipedia's rules, their policies cover paraphrasing and copy-paste plagiarism regardless of the source being cited. Also I would recommend linking the wiki pages of the famous computer scientists you name in their respective sections so that those who would want to learn more can branch off and have those pages immediately accessible (I'm assuming that section was part of Assignment 6).