User:Ainsleymacdougal/Memphis soul/Zynxo Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Ainsleymacdougal


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Ainsleymacdougal/Memphis soul
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Memphis soul

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead of this article is concise and contains all the important information that is written in more detail later in the article. The introductory sentences are well-written and provide a good summary of what the article is about. Everything my peer added seems to be reflected in the lead.

The content of this article is all relevant to the topic at hand. It is a relatively short article so nothing seems out of place or unnecessary. Everything added is up to date as well. The "Memphis Soul Music" section my peer added is a great addition that explains in detail what the music consists of and its origins.

This article's content is neutral and contains no bias. There does not appear to be any persuasion or favoring towards any ideas. Everything is represented equally.

All the new content added seems to be well cited with reliable, thorough sources, though the old content does not contain many secondary sources. The content matches up with its sources though maybe more secondary sources could be added.

This article is very well-organized. Again it is short so it is easily readable and gets straight to the point. There aren't any grammatical or spelling errors that I can find.

This article contains no images. I think this could add a lot to the quality of the article since it is fairly short. Maybe pictures of some old popular soul groups or some of the original studios could be added.

Overall, this article is quick and to the point which is great. I think better secondary sources would help add some content or at least reinforce the content already there. I think the section added is a great addition to this article and has improved its quality by a lot.