User:Airahlonley/Sabia australis/Narcissusgasp Peer Review

General info

 * "Ariahlonley"


 * User:Airahlonley/Sabia australis:
 * Sabia australis:

Evaluate the drafted changes
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for species native to Hawaii and for the World to meet.

Use a different font style (bold or italic) for your answers so it is easy for the author to see your comments!

''Keisha's Response: After reading the peer review, I only saw a few suggestions. Those suggestions include moving a few sentences to sections where it will be more appropriate and just double checking my grammar and sentences to make sure that my information is as concise and clear for people to understand it. I will be sure to take what you said and implement it into my article so it can become more improved. Thank you for peer reviewing my article!''
 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) * Is there anything from your review that impressed you? The article is very informative and well structured, evident where many things are hyperlinked, very cool.
 * 3) Check the main points of the article:
 * 4) * Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? (and not the genus or family) The article delves into the species itself, not genus or family, +5 coolness.
 * 5) * Are the subtitles for the different sections appropriate? The subtitles are relevant and appropriate. "Diet" is a relatively new section to me, but it makes sense as you have information about it.
 * 6) * Is the information under each section appropriate or should anything be moved? Overall, information is appropriate, but some parts need to be moved to more appropriate.
 * 7) * Is the writing style and language of the article appropriate? (concise and objective information for a worldwide audience) Yes.
 * 8) Check the sources:
 * 9) * Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number? Each direct statement is followed with a citation to a reference, only a phrase or two is written without a direct citation.
 * 10) * Is there a reference list at the bottom? Yes, with 6 sources.
 * 11) * Is each of those sources linked with a little number? All sources listed in references are used within the article with a citation.
 * 12) * What is the quality of the sources? The sources seem to be informative and reliable via CRAAP test.
 * 13) Give some suggestions on how to improve the article (think of anything that could be explained in more details or with more clarity or any issues addressed in the questions above):
 * 14) * What changes do you suggest and how would they improve the article? I think that moving around different information in some sections would help this article significantly. For example, under the Habitat sections is a sentence talking about its almost commensalistic relationship with its host, stating that "Sabia australis resides on the shells belonging to other mollusks." This information would be most appropriate under "Diet," as that section uses that information most relevantly.
 * 15) * Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready? Sure, with a couple of touch-ups I think that this article would pass as a normal published article on the Wiki.
 * 16) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? Again, polishing the article is what's going to best help it. There's quite a bit of information present and working on presenting that information in the most concise and relevant way possible is what's going to distinguish it.
 * 17) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Some sources used would probably help in my article.