User:Aizlynn.Gonzalez/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it defines and goes into depth about what this course is and all the concepts that encompass it. It is a simple topic that can be defined and because it is a broad topic I assumed it would have been edited a lot and be a reliable article.

Evaluate the article
The Article begins with a decent lead that gives a brief outline of the contents of the article. The lead however discusses mostly the history of zoology and only briefly discusses the other aspects. The article is up to date and has been edited this year. All the information provided in the article is concise and relevant to the topic. However, the article could include more information. It seems to only scratch the surface of the information they could include. The article is neutral and has no biases, it simply states the history and discusses what zoology is. They include multiple sources. The sources are reliable and up to date. One source was even as recent as 2020. The article itself is easy to understand and is organized into different sections. There are several pictures, definitions, links, and other resources that help better support the information. The score was a C-class article. The article is unfinished and needs more information. The article also had a history of being vandalized but had been resolved. The article is good visually and content-wise however, they have a lot of room to grow and to fully dive into zoology.