User:Aizlynn.Gonzalez/Gymnothorax rueppelliae/Phaygood Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) Aizlynn.Gonzalez


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Aizlynn.Gonzalez/Gymnothorax_rueppelliae?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Gymnothorax rueppelliae

Peer Review
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for the amazing species.


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.) I think the article did well in adding additional information to the stub.
 * 2) Is there anything from your review that impressed you? The sheer amount of information added was impressive.
 * 3) Any turn of phrase that described the species in a clear way? Not that I can see.
 * 4) Check the sources:
 * 5) Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number? Yes
 * 6) Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? It seems like some information drifts off the species but for the most part, yes.
 * 7) Is there a reference list at the bottom? Is each of those sources linked with a little number? Yes
 * 8) What is the quality of the sources? Great quality.
 * 9) What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Maybe adding a section to make the information more unique like the ecosystem impact of the species or something to that affect.
 * 10) Why would those changes be an improvement? It would add to the information on the stub and give more to the reader.
 * 11) Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready? I don't think it is ready for the world to see just yet but it is on the way. The organization isn't exactly similar to other Wikipedia pages but it is going in the right direction.
 * 12) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? I think adding some unique information and the organization would improve the article.
 * 13) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? I think the link to each reference is something I can take and add into my own article.

''Thank you for the recommendations. I will be sure to go through and edit my article. I will also be sure to add more information.''