User:Aizlynn.Gonzalez/Gymnothorax rueppelliae/Shurwill Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Aizlynn Gonzalez


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Editing User:Aizlynn.Gonzalez/Gymnothorax rueppelliae - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Editing User:Aizlynn.Gonzalez/Gymnothorax rueppelliae - Wikipedia

Peer Review
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for the amazing species.


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) Is there anything from your review that impressed you? From what I have read so far it sounds good for a start, the distribution and habitat are well done. Locally here in Hawaii we call them puss head eels.
 * 3) Any turn of phrase that described the species in a clear way? The description of the bands and the yellow color on the head.
 * 4) Check the sources:
 * 5) Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number? Some not all.
 * 6) Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? Yes.
 * 7) Is there a reference list at the bottom? Is each of those sources linked with a little number? Yes.
 * 8) What is the quality of the sources? 4/4.
 * 9) What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Not too sure, maybe try and add links in your sentences to your references.
 * 10) Why would those changes be an improvement? No potential plagiarism.
 * 11) Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready? It needs to be tweaked a bit to be world ready but its a great start.
 * 12) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? Probably look for a couple more sources with some more broad information like cultural or agricultural use.
 * 13) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? The small numbers for the references.

''Thank you for the notes. I do have to make sure to add a link to every sentence. I will also be sure to add more information into my article since it is a bit short.''