User:Ajensen3/sandbox

Notes on the CSA Article:

I think the article started off strong with the definition and summary of the idea, but the rest of the article seemed to only rephrase these basic concepts, rather than adding to them. There was a real lack of citations and sources so it was hard to see if the information was correct or where it came from. Many definitions seemed to be made up by the author rather than based in fact. The sources that are referenced in the article are credible, strong sources, mainly research studies. In the History section, there is quite a few random facts that do not pertain to the article they were placed in and seemed like they may have been added later by another contributor. The history section was also very brief and vague, giving only a basic overview and a few facts. The section, CSA System, was completely repeated from earlier in the article and offered no new information, I think it could be removed.

Notes on Environmental Racism:

-biased definiton with no source or citation

-lots of long run on topics and information overload

-individual cases can be biased and should not be turned into generalizations of an entire topic