User:Ajk1129/Divergent evolution/HabitsofEelz Peer Review

General info
Ajk1129
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to Divergent evolution article draft:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Current version of Divergent evolution article

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

As of right now, there is nothing under the heading 'Lead Section' in the sandbox draft for the Divergent evolution article. It is unclear if the lead section is sufficient as is, or if it needs to be improved. It seems as though the plan is to elaborate on topics in the article that are not currently sufficiently explained. In general, the headings 'Darwin's Finches' and 'Divergent evolution in dogs' seem way too specific to be full headings. I would recommend merging these under the heading 'Examples of divergent evolution' or something similar.

The tone of the article should be updated to look more professional and neutral; I believe this is your current plan and I agree that it's a good improvement to make to the article. Right now, the article seems biased towards the examples it's referencing and I think the overall tone could be more unbiased.

There were no sources in the article draft but several mentions were made to add sources in the near future; I think this is also a good move. Currently, there is a lot of unsourced information in the article. The 5 sources in the article right now seem good, and the links work, but I think an article like this needs a lot more than 5 sources. My suggestions would be to work on finding adequate sources for what is already in the article and then, if possible, add new information. Ideally both of these improvements would happen. I think the plan to improve this article is good and it seems to be headed in a good direction.