User:Ajla.halilovic/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: The Cheeses Task Force WikiProject Food and drink/Cheeses task force
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate. I like cheese a lot. It is my favorite snack.

Lead

 * Guiding questions
 * Some Wikipedians have formed a task force to better organize information in articles related to cheese. This page and its sub-pages contain their suggestions; it is hoped that this project will help to focus the efforts of other Wikipedians. If you would like to help, please inquire on the Discussion Page, see the Task list below or just start editing articles and link them to the project using the WikiProject Food and drink/Cheeses task force banner.


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? yes, cheese from different articles
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? yes, it says that it is many different articles just about cheese
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? no
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? there is not too much detail, it is more of a huge overview, probably because it is not just focused on one article, but instead a formed task force for cheese

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic? yes
 * Is the content up-to-date? yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? no
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? it just talks about cheese, but has u[ to date articles and information about different sources talking about cheese. its beautiful if you ask me.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral? yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? no because it is more of an overview, it is more general although it does state specific goals. These goals are also general and applicable to all of the sources though.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? no not at all

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? yes
 * Are the sources current? yes
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? yes because it is a task force
 * Check a few links. Do they work? yes

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? yes
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? no
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? yes very

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? no
 * Are images well-captioned? n/a
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? n/a
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? n/a

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? n/a
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? it Is part of wikiprojsects, project food/drink/cheese task force
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? it is very factual

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * What are the article's strengths? very organized and factual
 * How can the article be improved? pictures
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? developed well as a task force and as an information portal basically

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: