User:Ajp256/Three Prisoners problem/Ruby00269 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Ajp256


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Three Prisoners problem
 * Three Prisoners problem

Evaluate the drafted changes
- Very interesting topic choice.

- I have viewed the entire Wikipedia page, and I feel like the page is a bit too mathematical, might be hard for most readers to understand. Perhaps adding concise and easy introductory sentences to the beginning of each paragraph might help.

- The Lead section should have more descriptions (it currently has only 2 sentences). The first paragraph is too easy and it doesn't feel like an abstract or a summery of the entire page. Also, the introductory sentence should be concise and more relevant to the topic. Perhaps add another section about the history of this problem, then you can move the contents right now in the first section to that section.

- The page could use some more images as it makes this very interesting mathematical problem clearer to readers. Just make sure you caption the image you put on the page.

- There are not a lot of links to the "Notes" and "References" section, could use more work there. Might need to check if there are some contents that just copy-and-paste the whole thing to Wiki (some of the pages have problems like this).

- According to the talk page, there are some back and forth on a few paragraphs, especially in the "Solution" section. You might want to refer to some books or paper to clear that section out. You can read through what the previous editors wrote and try add your thoughts and reference onto the talk page to see if they agree.

- As the talk page stated, the "Solution" section is confusing and unorganized. Could use more revise and properly source the two separate mathematical formulations.

- Since you haven't start on drafting yet, my recommendations were based on the original "Confidence Interval" page, and what improve or add to the page.