User:Ajpiece/Double Militancia/Ritadahi Peer Review

I think you did well at keeping a neutral tone throughout this article. You described was Double Militancy meant and in what historical context emerged. I am glad you added a Background section, because it added important context about the term and you were able to use the space to quote/refer to different people to make your point. I also like how you were able to provide an example of what has come from this notion of Double Militancy, which shows people the concrete manifestation of it.

You stayed consistent with your citations, which is great. One very minor note on grammar; theres a missing [.] before the sentence "This contradictory experience led some Latin American revolutionary women to develop increased militancy against oppression" in the first section! You used a lot of peer-reviewed articles/books, which is great because they are reliable and strong. You gave a good range of sources in terms of dates (1980s - 2023). The only thing I can think of is maybe try and diversify your sources by including sources like news articles or videos, or add in some visuals (though I'm not sure of what).

Great job overall!!

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)