User:Ajsorota/Agonism/Michael.gary16 Peer Review

Your goal with a peer review is to identify specific ways the article could be improved, and note any major problems that ought to be fixed. Consider these questions:


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?

Hi Andrew! This is a fascinating topic that you've chosen and I'm glad I had the chance to read about it. Your lead is excellent. It is concise, thoughtful, and importantly, grabs the reader's attention. Furthermore, your writing throughout the piece is professional, neutral, and possesses a natural flow that drives the piece forward. Lastly, you have a solid number of citations and adeptly link your topic to other existing Wikipedia articles. All in all, you've made excellent progress and I have little to say regarding revisions. Once you have a larger draft complete, I'll be able to provide more detailed suggestions.