User:Ajtantico/Friends (Omar Apollo EP)/NK560 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Ajtantico
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Ajtantico/Friends (Omar Apollo EP)

Lead evaluation
The lead is short and concise and introduces the topic well.

Content evaluation
The content is up-to-date and relevant to the topic, but I think there could be more added to it. You could add sections like "Reception", "Awards & Nominations", or something like that. Or you could add a section talking about the inspiration for the EP. It would be good to include the cover of the EP as a picture as well.

Tone and balance evaluation
The tone is neutral and unbiased, information is stated objectively.

Sources and references evaluation
The sources are reliable and relevant to the topic and all of the links work. The related articles are appropriate and related to the topic.

Organization evaluation
The content is grammatically correct and easy to read, but there are a few sentences that are missing periods. There also isn't a table of contents, which may be fine since there aren't tons of paragraphs of text, but if you're planning on adding more sections then adding a table of contents would be good.

Images and media evaluation
There aren't any images or media so far, but I think you should add the cover art as well as the audio of the title track, or whichever song is the most popular fro the EP.

New Article Evaluation
The article meets the notability requirements, and there is a decent variety of sources that are cited, but iTunes was cited a disproportionate amount of times. There probably aren't a ton of accurate sources to choose from on the topic though so it's okay. The article has a similar format of other articles minus the table of contents, and is missing a photo in the title info box. There are links to related articles that are relevant to the topic. It feels and looks like a standard article, it's just lacking a few things.

Overall evaluation
I think the existing content and information on the article is informative and relevant, but I also think that there is more that could be added. It describes the EP itself very well, such as listing the runtime of all the songs, release date, track order, etc. but there could be more to say about it other than the content of the EP. I think adding pictures and audio would be good, as well as adding another section about something else like how successful the EP was or what the inspiration for it was.