User:Akang8/sandbox

Article Evaluations
The Part 2 Questions I will be answering are #5 and #8.

The section that is underrepresented in this article is the part on "Military sexual slavery." Rather than focusing on the gender inequality seen in the military or the way women have been treated during times of war, the article chooses to focus more on gender inequality in the workspace. The paragraph on Military sexual slavery is part of the history section, and this section as a whole could have been elaborated.

In the Talk section of this article, there is a lot of talk about the sources used for the information. A lot of editors had a problem with the sources because they appeared unreliable. A lot of the editors talked about South Korea being a "press club system." Therefore, the information should come from academic sources, rather than popular news outlets. If they were to come from news outlets, they should come from Western news outlets.

Edits
Moreover, these women were victims to both violence and sexualization. In the European Journal of Women's Studies, author Yonson Ahn states soldiers of lower ranks conflicted violence in the form of sexual abuse towards the comfort women as a way to cop with the harsh treatment from higher ranked soldiers and war. To practice power and confirm their masculinity, soldiers had what Ahn terms "Shadow family." These shadow families were pregnant comfort women reliant on the soldiers to provide stability. This idea perpetuated the existing frame of gender inequality present in the typical Korean family of men holding more power with decisions and having to be the head of the family.

(for article, to add)