User:Akaub/Undulated moray/Kylee Jane Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Undulated Moray


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Editing User:Akaub/Undulated moray - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Undulated moray - Wikipedia
 * Undulated moray - Wikipedia

Peer Review
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for the amazing species.


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) Is there anything from your review that impressed you? -You have a good variety of headings such as description, distribution, habitat, and a lot of information on cultural significance.
 * 3) Any turn of phrase that described the species in a clear way?- The first sentence is a good explanation of what this species is, its scientific and generic name, and where they can be found.
 * 4) Check the sources:
 * 5) Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number? - No, there are no references.
 * 6) Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? -yes, the article has sole information about that species only.
 * 7) Is there a reference list at the bottom? Is each of those sources linked with a little number? -No
 * 8) What is the quality of the sources? -N/A
 * 9) What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? - When you talk about them being nocturnal, I would explain what nocturnal means. I would also add resources to where you got your information from.
 * 10) Why would those changes be an improvement? - this would help provide the reader with a better understanding of the species and also it would help give the reader evidence for where you got your information from.
 * 11) Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready? -This article is not quite ready for the world to see on wikipedia. You should first add your sources, then link those sources to the statements on the page, to provide evidence of your information.
 * 12) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? -Add your resources.
 * 13) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? -You reminded me how I need to find information on cultural significance.