User:Akaub/Undulated moray/Sriracha0414 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Username: Akaub


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Akaub/Undulated_moray?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Undulated moray

Peer Review
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for the amazing species.


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) Is there anything from your review that impressed you?
 * 3) * The Cultural Significance section really impressed me, I didn't know any of those facts about the Undulated Moray! That section really emphasized it's importance to the Hawaiian culture!
 * 4) Any turn of phrase that described the species in a clear way?
 * 5) * The Description section helped me imagine the species in a clear way.
 * 6) Check the sources:
 * 7) Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number?
 * 8) * No, there are no statements or sentences in the text that are linked to any source
 * 9) Does the article only discuss the species the article is about?
 * 10) * There are no articles or sources to read on, so I can't answer this question.
 * 11) Is there a reference list at the bottom? Is each of those sources linked with a little number?
 * 12) * There's a Reference List Title, but there are no sources underneath the title.
 * 13) What is the quality of the sources?
 * 14) * There are no articles or sources to read on, so I can't answer this question.
 * 15) What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article?
 * 16) * The one major change is to add a Reference List & maybe, a more subtle change is to add a "Discovery" section before all the other sections, so make "Discovery" the first section you add to your article.
 * 17) *# Why would those changes be an improvement?
 * 18) *## Those changes would be an improvement because the Reference List is a MAJOR characteristic that is needed for a Wikipedia article, it would leave a major dent on you and the credibility of your article. The "Discovery" section would also add a little background for the species you're writing about.
 * 19) *# Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready?
 * 20) *#* No, the article is not ready for "prime-time" and for the world to see. I mentioned how the author could possibly improve the article he/she's writing about above.
 * 21) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?
 * 22) * The most important change the author could do to improve the article is to add a Reference List for your articles, so people know you're not just pulling these "facts" out of thin air.
 * 23) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article?
 * 24) * I noticed that I need to add a "Cultural Significance" section to my own article!