User:Akbugday/Climate change in algeria/Diyala815 Peer Review

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead
The lead has not been updated yet to reflect the changes made—you should definitely do this, as some great work has been done.

Content
In terms of content, truly significant additions have been made to this article! The original is bafflingly empty, and the authors have made substantive changes, introducing multi-faced angles to the issue of climate change in Algeria. The article now has a much more well-rounded depiction of the natural systems and their risks in the coming years. If more could be added on energy policy and expand on Algeria's sustainability strategies (the original article mentions these), I would help to round out what the country is doing, action-wise.

Tone and balance
The content added is neutral and balanced, reporting facts and findings with a plain and matter-of-fact style.

Sources and references
Excellent use of sources from websites and news organizations to scholarly journals. Claims are well supported. No notes here.

Organization
The content is strikingly well-written. Concise writing and neutral tone give confidence to the report and allow for a smooth flow to the article. There are minor syntax errors in some spots—just worth a look-over.

Images and media
The images added to the geography section provide a nice sense of place to the subject.

Overall impressions
The authors have done a tremendous job improving the article.

General info
Mathilde000 and Moonsnail37
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Akbugday/Climate change in algeria
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Climate change in Algeria