User:Akbugday/Climate change in iran/Moonsnail37 Peer Review

General info
(Akbugday)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Akbugday/Climate change in iran
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Overall the content is relevant to the topic. There are many places where you give substantial information, but it could be arranged a bit better. There is little to no picture/content engagement portions of the article, but the number of reliable sources is admirable. I think adding more of a timeline would help the reader overall engage with the reading, as well as absorb information. As a visual learner, adding graphs and pictures would greatly benefit the experience. The reference area could use a bit more work as it is not formatted properly. I think your best section was adaptation, which showed a timeline and engaging connected material that contributes to a broader knowledge. Using this format for the rest of your information can be really helpful.