User:Akdf4h/sandbox

Article Evaluation


 * Everything in the article is relevant to the topic, but there was a general lack of information and much of the article was dedicated to the chemical structure of the toxins as opposed to their effects.
 * The article remained neutral throughout which is made less difficult being that the article is over a type of toxin
 * The citations work and the sources support the claims, however the article itself asks for Wikipedia editors to add more information and citations.
 * Each fact does not have a reference but those that are provided are neutral and well-established secondary sources.
 * Information appeared to be current with the literature I have recently read, but there is plenty of information that can be added as it is a broad topic.
 * The talk page has a singular entry about a potential paper that could be used to update information
 * The article is rated as low-importance and is part of WikiProject Chemistry
 * This article was not a topic we discussed in class.