User:Akozarski/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Internet challenge

Evaluate the article
Lead Section: The lead section is straight to the point with a first sentence that identifies what the article is going to be about. The paragraph is not overly detailed and it just provides a small overview of the topic.

 Content:  The article is not up to date and it includes content/examples of internet challenges from a few years ago or later. Examples of current internet challenge trends can be added to make it more up to date.

 Tone and Balance:  This article is written in a neutral point of view for the most part. But, although not super easy to recognize, the article touches on the negative outcomes that these internet challenges have had. It is also kind of persuading because it puts points out those bad outcomes, making the reader think that these trends are only harmful, when in reality, challenges like the ALS Ice Bucket Challenge have raised a lot of awareness and money for a good cause.

 Sources and References:  They do back up their claims with sources, they include all the references at the bottom. They don't have a source for their last paragraph though. All the links work, but one is in dutch.

 Organization and Writing Quality:  The article is straight forward and presents the information in an easy way to read. Theres not a lot of content on the page but it stills gives a decent amount of information to get an idea of what "internet challenges" are. While reading and looking over the article, I did not see any grammatical or spelling errors. It is also organized, there is an intro paragraph, a paragraph discussing the concept of "internet challenges" and what they are, a paragraph of the controversy that they have brought, and the last paragraph also touches on a controversial challenge that has taken place.

 Images and Media:  There are no images used that are in the article, I feel that it would be hard to pictures to this article because I don't know what it would be off.

 Talk Page Discussion:  There are no discussions going on in the talk page. It is considered a Stub Low article, meaning that it has low importance. It is within the scope of WikiProject Articles Internet Culture and is also reviewed by members of the WikiProject for creation.

 Overall Impressions:  The article is very straight forward and gets the point across if you want to know about internet challenges. It's short and right to the point making it easy to get quick information. The article could be better if it included a paragraph about the good outcomes that have come from internet challenges, this would balance out the paragraph about the controversy caused by the challenges. Because of thus, it seems a little biased because it hints to readers that only bad things have come from participating in internet challenges. It seems well developed besides the point i just touched one. There's not much to write about internet challenges, but maybe someone could touch on the beginning history of how they have started and how the challenges have progressed over time.