User:Akozarski/sandbox

FactCheck.org

Lead Section
The lead section gives a quick over view of what FackCheck.org is. It's simple, including the point of the website and what the website is used for. It also includes the different sections that the website has. All the information is straight forward with no opinion based statements.

Content
Everything in the article is relevant to the topic. They are all factual based statements that do not lead the reader to a certain opinion. The article has some information from many years ago, but it is important that it is included because it provides information from he history of the website and how it was involved with elections. I think something that could be added is some content about how its being evolved right now in present time to keep up with current politics. The article does not have any noticeable gaps. The it does not under or misrepresent any information.

Tone and Balance
The article is written in a neutral tone. There is no words or phrases that leads you think that the website is good or bad. There are no claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position. It mostly just gives historical content of when the website was involved in presidential elections but does not choose sides or anything like that.

Sources and References
The links in the article work but some do not support the claims ver well. For example, citation 16, the website does not relate to the statement that needs the citation to insure that its a fact. Otherwise, the links all connect to the statements and provide reassurance to the claims.

Organization and Writing Quality
This article is very organized and easy to follow. The information is set up in three main parts. This includes the leading section, the history section, and the awards and recognition section. Each section provides general information to educate the reader of the topics. All the information is easy to find and not hard to understand.

Images and Media
There are no images included besides the logo. I do not thunk it is necessary for an image to be added. It would not help it in any way and would just make the article look more cluttered.

Talk Page Discussion
In the talk page, there are three edits. Two of them were just external links being modified. And the other one was a a vague sentence without a valid source. It was a sentence that had two citations and neither of them supported it in any way.

Overall Impressions
Overall, this article was easy to follow and gave straight up information without making it too complicated. I feel like more recent information could be added to educated the reader on how the website is being used today with current issues.