User:Akrovan/Environmental Concerns of Tren Maya/Cheesefries32 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) Akrovan/Environmental Concerns of Tren Maya


 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Akrovan/Environmental Concerns of Tren Maya
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists): n/a

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

-Really clear introduction, I think it is concise and has clear goals. -Overall, one aspect that could be bolstered is the use of sources. I only see two references used in the references section which could definitely be increased. I also think it would be nice to hyperlink definitions used.

-the tone of the text is very neutral which is good and the facts are laid out.

-One thing that could be improved is there are a lot of statements that don't have figures or numbers to support them. It would make the article even stronger to use more percentages/specific values for impacts. It also seems that there is a lot of speculation about what could happen so maybe that is why there isn't a ton of numbers.

-Each section is pretty evenly written and I think the information is overall laid out really well!