User:Aksgpp3131/Children's Health Insurance Program/Ariellarose19 Peer Review

General info
Aksgpp3131
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Children's Health Insurance Program
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead has not been updated to reflect the new content but the lead works for the article. The lead does include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic. The lead does include a brief introductory description of the articles major sections. The lead does not include information that is not present in the article. The lead is concise and not over-detailed.

The content added is relevant to the topic and up to date. There is no content missing. The article does deal with one of Wikipedias equity gaps and addresses topics related to historically underrepresented populations.

The content added was neutral and does not appear to be heavily biased towards one position or another. The viewpoints are shown to be represented equally.

The new content is backed by a reliable secondary source of information. The content accurately reflects what the cited sources say. The sources are thorough. The sources are current. The sources are written by diverse authors. I do not think that there were better sources available. The links work.

The article does include images that enhance understanding the topic. The images are well captioned and laid out well and follow the copyright guidelines.

The article has multiple reliable sources and accurately represents available information and literature on the subject. The article follows familiar patterns and links to other relevant articles.

The content has improved the overall quality of the article. The content added gave more insight on a more personal perspective a children’s health insurance program. I think it really humanized the article and gave important insight that would not have been achieved without that. The content added could be improved with more sources cited.