User:Aksi great/RfA

I have thought out an innovative system which bcrats could use to judge RfAs.

The system is based on 2 main facts. Whether a Bcrat things a point to be valid (editwarring, lack of civility, good work in clearing backlogs, good editor, work in XfDs, vandal reverts, DYK help etc), not so valid (like not being part of IRC, edit-summaries not >90 but only 89 % etc., i like him) and invalid (sockpuppetry, anon users, repeat votes, etc)

VALID VOTES ---

Each valid vote would be counted as 1 vote. then the value of each per above vote starts reducing by 0.1. If the same point is raised, but with more clarification or further diffs, examples etc. the vote would count as CV+0.1 (i.e. value would increase to the previous level). The minimum reached should be 0.5, after which all per above votes get only 0.5 weightage. This gives incentive to research more about a user, reduces the importance of per above votes, but at the same time doesn't totally discount per above votes.

NOT SO VALID

Not so valid votes would get only 0.4 and "per above" votes in such cases would be reducing the value of that vote by 0.1 with 0.1 being the minimum value that can be reached.

NOMINATION --

A special case is a nomination. A nomination (self-nom, nom by others, or by a project) would count as 5 points. Every co-nom and per-nom support works just like a "per-above" vote with it's value reducing by 0.1 as usual. Points can also be given for every extra-question answered. The person who asks the question can decide whether the canditate has answered the question satisfactorily. 0.5 could be given for each question.

FINALLY ---

The final total for each would be S(t) and O(t) with the difference being R. If the value of R meets a certain threshold D, the candidate can be promoted.

The weight value of D can be decided in 2 ways. Let the community reach a consensus or design a program to go through all RfAs and come up with a figure.

EXAMPLE OF HOW SYSTEM WOULD WORK

Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Aksi_great

Point tally S(t), O(t)


 * Blnguyen nom earns me 5, Samir's co-nom a 1 point (it has examples FA, DYK work). S(t) = 6
 * Shreshth gives a per nom vote worth 0.9. S(t) = 6.9
 * Sarah 0.8 S(t) = 7.8 and so on

For opposes, none of the questioners voted for me, so I do not ( : get any points for that. Hahnchen gets me a 1 in the O(t)

Result S(t)-O(t)=whatever and as it is greater than D, I pass!