User:Al89762537/sandbox

Evaluating Content
The first paragraph of the first article immediately lets the reader know that the article is about the relationship between "magmatism and extensional tectonics" in Iceland The language of the article is oversaturated with scientific jargon, making the article hard to follow. However, there are a lot of visuals that help to clarify the reader's understanding of the material. I wish there was more information on basalt ages – it would have greatly aided the reader's understanding. The second article has an abstract preceding the article, informing the reader of what they should expect in the article. The first paragraph of the second article also clearly outlines the study presented in the paper. The citations in the article makes it difficult to read, because it interrupts the reader's flow. The language is heavy with scientific jargon, more than the first article. There are a lot of images in this article – these images are in color too – which is beneficial in understanding the concepts presented in the article.

Evaluating Tone
There is almost a sense of urgency when the author is talking about the plate tectonics shifting, and the way that the deformation in Iceland is not constant because of the continual addiction of magma to the surface. The second article has a formal and scientific tone, using only empirical evidence to support its claims and not providing any opinions or potentially bias statements. Both the articles are neutral. There are no claims that heavily lead towards a specific position, and all viewpoints are equally represented.

Evaluating Sources
All the citations from the articles that I checked were unbiased and reputable sources; all the facts in the article were referenced using in-text citations. All the sources are neutral.

Evaluating Talk Page
There is no activity on the talk page of this article. The article is part of the WikiProject Volcanoes and is rated as a Stub-Class on the quality scale.