User:Al l/sandbox

Article Evaluation

 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Most if it is relevant.


 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Pretty neutral.


 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No viewpoints, so perhaps we can find points of view
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * The first one is a bit off.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Not really.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Not necessarily out of date, but more information can be added.
 * Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * Not talk page.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * Mid-importance; WikiProject Anthro.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * Plomo mummy information is pretty scarce.

Group Members
Tina Zheng, Rachel Camarena, Wendy Yang, Anna Pan

Rough Draft Sentences
The Plomo Mummy was discovered by Guillermo Chacón Carrasco, Jaime Ríos Abarca, and Luis Gerardo Ríos Barrueto. It was later taken to the Chilean National Museum of Natural History, where Grete Mostny received and processed the mummy.
 * note: add link to Grete Mostny's Wikipedia
 * add citations