User:Alaila/sandbox

Article Evaluation:

1.Telecommunications in Eritrea

2. Internet censorship in Morocco

3. Internet Censorship in Colombia

4. Censorship of websites in Egypt (2017)

5. Stasi


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Erit: Yes the information on the site is relevant, but not very detailed
 * Moro: All the information is relevant to the article topic, without distractions
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * The info seems to be limited to data up to 2011, which means that there must be newer info that can be added. The section on internet censorship is rather limited compared to links to index's like Freedom House which indicate that Eritrea is one of the least free states.
 * The most recent example of censorship given is from 2013, so more recent examples can surely be added. I know of one case where there was internet and human rights suppression when a man was killed on the north side of the country because he was linked to a second attempt to induce an Arab Spring in Morocco, which is not included on the page.
 * What else could be improved?
 * I think the internet censorship section of this article should be its own separate page with a lot more detail because as it stands now, it makes it seem like censorship is not a big issue, although it is.
 * The page generally lacks many references to the height of surveillance and censorship, while neighboring countries experienced the Arab Spring. Morocco clearly had stringent regulations since they never experienced a powerful uprising.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * The article is neutral. There are no clear biases.
 * The article is neutral
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No the information is rather insufficient.
 * The article is also not very long, so not much to be overrepresented. Again, Arab spring era is underrepresented
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * There are only two citations. Both support the claims made. However, it seems there is a dispute about some of the un-cited claims in a talk board someone started.
 * The links to the citations work. The sources do support the claims, but I think that there are areas where there should have been more citations like under the Sniper case section.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Are the citations reliable?

User:Alaila/New sandbox