User:Alaina.marcotte/Lake Cushman/Bholmes8 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Alaina.marcotte


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alaina.marcotte/Lake_Cushman?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Lake Cushman

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead is generally the same as the original article. It is well done so there is not much work that needed to be done in the lead, but it could use an introduction of how the article would be laid out and what will be covered. In other words, a brief description of the articles main sections would be handy to include in the lead.

The content added is thorough but also to the point and relevant to the topic. In addition, the added information is up-to-date and helps add to the overall usefulness of explaining the topic. The article does not address Wikipedia's ethical gaps but it is more of an informative article so it is not an issue.

In terms of tone and balance, the article remains neutral and has an informative tone. There is no sign of bias nor does the article attempt to persuade the reader.

The sources used in this article are mainly not from scholarly sources but the sources used are cited and introduce useful information for the article. The sources are also thorough and up-to-date with relative information about the topic. There may be some better peer-reviewed articles to include in the sources but it might be difficult to find them based on the topic.

Organization wise, the content is well written and easy to follow. It is also spaced out into sections that cover various aspects of the topic. The page itself includes pictures that add to the writing, and the drafted changes include one additional image.

Overall, I feel as thought the content definitely added to the overall quality of the article.