User:Alanflz/James M. Jay/Sdang05 Peer Review

General info
Alanflz
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:James M. Jay
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
The article is well written. It has an informative and simple lead. The article is well-organized into multiple sections. All of the content in each section is relevant to the section. The article is well supported as every claim/idea is supported with a citation. The article has 5 references which are properly cited. The only suggestions I have are to include more AAAWWUBBIS sentences but this is not necessary. I also reviewed the bibliography, and all of the sources on there were consistent with the ones used in the article. The summaries on that were simple and had all of the necessary information. Overall, the article is easy to understand, neutral, and interesting.