User:Albanmartinez/Odilia Romero/Chris22Y Peer Review

General info
Albanmartinez
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Albanmartinez/Odilia Romero
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead


 * Missing Lead that Describes main topic of article and says the diffrent sections of the article

Content


 * Content in article is good at describing Odilia Romero's response to a recent scandal
 * Needs more context on Odilia Romero, possibly on upbringing or events that led her to found her organization and what she's done through it

Tone and Balance


 * Slightly biased tone as you only put what Odilia Romero said in response to the leaked audio, to get it to be neutral you should incorporate the response by the individuals in the leaked audio or tie what she said to what others were saying
 * neutral tone when describe the audio leak is good Sources and References


 * Missing citations on the leaked audio, such as if you got that from your first source or somewhere else
 * Source used is reliable as its from an independent news organization funded by its audience

Organization


 * Organization is done well making it easy to follow along the information your presenting
 * writing is clear and concise with no grammatical errors

Images and Media


 * should incorporate and image of Odilia Romero