User:Albanmartinez/Odilia Romero/Maddygross14 Peer Review

General info
Albanmartinez: username
 * Whose work are you reviewing?

The group’s article is called “Odilia Romero.”

Evaluate the drafted changes
The content is clear and concise and is on the right track. The Wikipedia entry also does a great job of not using any biased language. Make sure you start the entry with a strong opening sentence or phrase, to captivate the reader. I would check for very slight grammatical errors and fix some minor things pertaining to formatting, although the organization of the wiki is very well done. A few things I would make sure to highlight is more context relating to the issue at hand. For instance, talk more about who Odilia Romero is and why her remarks are so important to this scandal. Moreover, make sure you use more resources as Wikipedia is generally made up of other people’s writings and information. There is a whole tutorial on how to make citations, so make sure you properly cite any sources you use. I would also discuss more specifically the context of the scandal itself. What brought this scandal to the media and the city council? How did this scandal end? The information provided does shed light on some information that Wikipedia fails to provide, including more of Odilia’s remarks on the scandal. This helps to give more insight into the scandal and how it has affected people overall. I would also make sure to add some form of media or imagery to help the reader visualize the scandal or who Odilia Romero is. This could be done using a picture.