User:Albanyeditor05/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Talk:Horned deity

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because it seemed interesting, and ancient Egypt s always a topic that I am interested in. I first impression of the article was that it was fairly short and only had about 2 subtopics that it covered in total.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

At first the article did not start out with an "abstract-like" heading sentence that clearly introduced what was going to be talked about. I didn't see a lot of source referencing to back up the claims made in the article, there were no pictures of the deities that the article was referring to, and although there wasn't a lot of content, what was there was well organized and stayed on track in accordance to each subtopic.