User:AlbertAllmand/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Bom Jesus (ship)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because the topic itself interested me, and the location of the archaeological site seemed promising as well. I believe that this article is important to evaluate because at a first glance, the article had only a few sections, each with just a few sentences of information and little organization.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The leading section of the article, while short, is descriptive enough to inform the reader about what the article is about, and all of the topics mentioned in the leading paragraph are developed in the article. The content of the article is relevant and up to date, but is lacking a large amount of information and only includes certain facts about the site while leaving out others which are relevant. The tone of the article appears to be unbiased and neutral, but doesn't address fringe viewpoints or different positions on the site. Much of the article's facts are uncited, and a handful of the cited links on the article are linked to news sites and magazine articles, so the sourcing of the article is lacking. There are minor grammatical errors in the article, but is overall easy to read and organized into 2 specific sections that are outlined in the leading paragraph. The article contains no media of any kind. Overall, the article is a good outline for a strong Wikipedia article, but is missing a large amount of information, especially from reliable sources.