User:Albkvz/John of Salisbury/Kbtkxh Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Albkvz


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Albkvz/John_of_Salisbury?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * John of Salisbury

Evaluate the drafted changes
Overall, I love what you have done so far. Both sections in your sandbox are very well written.I suggest changing the section titles to something that matches the existing article more closely. I suggest something like “Criticism of Medical Science” instead of “Medical Science in John’s Time”. I’d also add a few more sources so that you aren’t reliant on a singular source for the entire section (unless there are no other sources available).

General article changes that could be made are to links to your section if they aren’t located earlier in the article compared to where you are adding your sections. Make sure to add information about his writings to where they are first mentioned in the article (his writings are mentioned in the “Secretary to the Archbishop of Canterbury” section).

Response to Peer Review
I will be changing the section title to match better, I agree. Unfortunately, my sources often don't talk about the same things and they are difficult to get. I do have a couple more sources, but they came in late so I haven't been able to work with them much yet.

I'm not sure if I understand the link part. Links to my section? You mean in the content page? Because that should do it automatically as I add headers to the main article. Also, I already added information about his writings to where they are first mentioned. That is what the sentence not crossed out is, and someone already spoke about the Policratus there. However, I don't want to flood that area too much about his writings when it's not specifically about his writings.