User:AleAlejandroAleAlejandro/Jackie Amezquita/MacSar.04 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(AleAlejandroAleAlejandro)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:AleAlejandroAleAlejandro/Jackie Amezquita
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

- The article successfully provides a very succinct Lead section.

Content

- The article provides relevant content that offers insight to the life of the subject

- The article provides relevant and concise contextual information

- The article is missing more information about the notable works and exhibitions. Has the artist ever commented on these works and experiences? Is there any concrete information about what the artworks represent or their significance to the artist?

- Are there any images of her performative work that could benefit your article?

- What is the artist's defined style or lens? What exactly does her work often challenge or support?

Tone

- The article has a neutral tone that provide informative and unbiased claims about the subject.

Sources

- The article offers a good amount of reliable references

- The article offers primary and secondary references from credible sources

Organization

- The article is well organized into clear sections that follow as comprehensible order

Overall Impression

- The article offers clear, non-argumentative, and interesting information about a notable figure.