User:AleBone21/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Nobel Peace Prize

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I've chosen to evaluate this article because the subject of this article, The Nobel Prize, is one of the most important prizes in the whole world. As a consequence of this, lot of people will search this prize when they want to learn more about it, due to its importance. Rating this article will help people understand if it is reliable or not.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

Lead
The lead is complete, everysince just by reading the first sentence, the object of the article is clear: The Nobel Peace Prize.

While reading, it is easy to understand the general basis of the prize: its objectives, why it was created and by who, how the selections are being made, controversies and problems.

Content
The content is completly relevant, coherent and updated to our times.

One aspect of the article that I would update is probably the one with the criticism, explaining better and longer the object, since it is an injteresting and relevant information about the prize. For example, explaining why an individual won the prize and also why there were controversies about that reward.

Tone
The tone of the article is neutral as supposed to be, everything is treated in an objective and clear way. As I said before, maybe the part reguarding the criticism could have been treated with more details and explanations, but the rest is perfect as it is.

Structure and Images
The article is well structured and well written. Infact, everything is well explained with every possible detail. The images selected help the reader to understand subjects that while reading could generate more questions, such as: how does the medal looks like?; How does the prize looks like?.

Talk page discussion
The wikiprojects in which this article is part are several, meaning that the artcile is a very positive and interesting one.

Everyday 1600 people look and search for this article, so it certainly isn't the most researched in the world, but it has a certain importance.

Overall Impression
This is an article with clear explanation reguarding the subject, with a detailed explanation that will help people to have more than a general idea reguarding this topic. The strenghts of the article are the details and the different topics that are treated, that cover the subject in a complete way. The article could be improved by adding more details and explanations when talking about criticism and controversies, a subject which is treated with less details than other subjects. The article is well-developped.

--~.