User:Aleahlani/Nystatin/Js3377 Peer Review

General info
Aleahlani
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Aleahlani/Nystatin?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Nystatin

Evaluate the drafted changes
Content:

-I'm a little lost when I initially look at your content. A few clarifications that would be helpful:

- What section do you want this to go in? It looks like it's somewhat related to the Other Uses section, in the paragraph starting with "Nystatin is also used as a tool by scientists performing "perforated" patch-clamp electrophysiologic recordings of cells." Or maybe methods of action? It doesn't seem to have an obvious home at the moment

- These are interesting points, but seem a little too detailed without enough background to bring the average reader in. Perhaps consider connecting it the electrophysiology part in other uses and adding some more transition. Remember that Wikipedia should reflect general consensus of research instead of current research. For example, instead of looking at what you know from working in your lab, look to sources that are a review of many similar scientists' work that matches what you understand.

-The paragraph about ergosterol and cholesterol seems to match really well with an existing sentence in the article. Put them together, but make sure that they flow and aren't overly repetitive.

Sources and References:

- Your source supports the last bit that you talk about well, notice however that it has a methods section. That means that it's original research. For Wikipedia articles, we want to focus on reviews of research instead of primary research whenever possible. Is there a review that references this article and covers similar ideas?

- I'd love to see some more sources to help support your other ideas!

Tone and Balance:

- The style of the first two paragraphs fits well with wikipedia.

- The third paragraph is currently written like a summary of an article that you read. While the content is applicable to the page, the style in which it's written is not really written as facts about nystatin but rather findings from research. Does that make sense? Wikipedia is a bit of a unique style.

Organization:

- Your citation should go down below in the references. Additionally, if you're going to talk about an article in a paragraph, say something along the lines of "researchers have found that....".

Overall Impressions:

- You clearly care about this topic and have some good ideas to start! Keep building it up and remember that you need sources that cover general consensus in the field.

- I noticed in the original article that there were quite a few places that could benefit from having sources to support the information given. This might be a great place for you to continue making edits on your page.