User:AlecStat71/Catherine D’Ignazio/Natalie elizabeth2 Peer Review


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way?
 * 2) The article does a good job of explaining Catherine's work and education life. I especially liked the layout of the work section because it flowed well and gave a good sequential summary of her life.
 * 3) What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement?
 * 4) I think the author could consider adding a family/home life and an awards section to the post.
 * 5) What’s the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?
 * 6) If possible, adding more references may help increase the amount of knowledge the article gives readers on the subject.
 * 7) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know!
 * 8) I noticed that the article specifically talks about the name of the book she published. I may have mentioned some of my person's titles in my article, but want to review it to see if I was as detailed as Alec.