User:Alee0046/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
2013 Baltimore Ravens season

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article to evaluate as I am a big Baltimore Ravens fan. I have watched every single game since 2010 and keep track with their news every season. I was hoping to see how accurate the article would be on of their seasons.

Evaluate the article
The lead section does a good job introducing the the 2013 Baltimore Ravens. However, near the end of the lead section, the article starts to stray away from the main topic and starts to explain specific information about one of the franchise's greats. The article does a great job including relevant content through each section. However, some key information was missing. An overall summary of the entire season would have been very beneficial to the article. They could have included key injuries, coaching staff changes, etc. Also, the content of the summary of each game was very disproportionate. The first game's summary explained the entirety of the game. However, the other games were only given one to two sentence summaries, not including all the key moments in each game. Throughout the article, a neutral tone was prevalent. There were not too many revisions to the article as other articles. However, the information provided was accurate and given the topic was about the Baltimore Ravens in 2013, most of the articles were from 2013, giving credibility to the sources. The organization of the all information is great as the article introduces all the members of the team and then goes on to talk about all the games chronologically. In addition, the information was very easy to read, making the article user-friendly. There weren't many graphics, but the graphics that were used were useful. For instance, tables of the game scores were displayed next to the game summaries. The article was rated as C-Class on the quality scale and mid-importance on the important scale. The article provided lots of useful information, but there was still some things that were missing such as key injuries. The article was not complete, but definitely had enough information to hold up as an article.