User:Alejandra Navarro Rosado/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Obstetrics
 * Article Evaluation
 * This article have a very good way to explain things, when i said this I mean that it really explain to you everything, all of the things that we can say are more medical, in the way that not everybody can understand it, have their owns links so you can look for an explanation or more information about it. The content of the article goes really well of what the article means, it's explained what is, what it's about and what you do on this fill. Everything that can be strange for some people have links to other article where that theme is explain or have a little information about it. But we have to include something here all the citations are reliable, some of them are rated like a C-Class but at the same time they can be rated High importance or Mid importance. The article does tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps.


 * Sources

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Cardiology
 * Article Evaluation
 * Something is really important to itemize is that since Cardiology is not a type of general surgery that can be specify of being pediatric or adult is just general the article explains the part of Cardiology on adults and also pediatric. The type of language the writer used is neutral since it goes very simple on the vocabulary, I don't want to offend people when is say simple is that it doesn't go too scientific so people don't have to be looking all the time for vocabulary to understand the information. All of the words that can't be understand have links that have more information or can explain to the reader better than the writer of this article can. It also have a lot of explanations of themes about Cardiology that can give you a medium idea of what happens on the theme.


 * Sources

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Chemical engineering
 * Article Evaluation
 * In this article there are things or themes that are mention that doesn't have an explanation or doesn't even hav a link or citation so we can look and read about it. iN the article it talks about more like how Chemical engineering start but it doesn't go to what is about in this time or even it doesn't have to talk about how this looks on this time it needs to explain what is, what people do on this job, things that a chemical engineering has to pass to get here. It really talks about what is but it needs more of how is chemical engineering.


 * Sources

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Surgery
 * Article Evaluation
 * This article it have a lot of information but much of it is just not complete or needs more to talk about so it can be a complete thought. Something that another Wikipedia user notice is that it really need more citations which I think he is right. Surgery is another world when we talk about medicine. The article have a lot of information but it needs more than just the simple things. It doesn't have a neutral vocabulary, it goes too much to surgeons words which needs to have links so other people can look for information and explanation so can understand but it doesn't so the vocabulary is not too simple.


 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Nursing
 * Article Evaluation
 * The article is a good article in all ways. It really have a good way to explain things, its a well organize article since goes to how nurses start to how to become a nurse. It also have links to other articles so if the reader wants to go to a specific subject or want to know more about nursing it have them there. Also it have a really neutral vocabulary and is well develop. Something that we have to consider is that in the part of Causes it have an alert to know that the section may unsourced predictions which is good to have so people don't think that is one hundred percent true all of it. The article really have good information to the people who don't know how to start or where to specialize in this career so they can be clear of what it is about.
 * Sources