User:Alejandro1123/Late Ceramic Period (Kansas)/MagalyGS Peer Review

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Hello! Some of the positives I see within your page is that you have a good outline, there is good data for contact eras, does have a neutral tone, and you have included good citations with the numbers. Some of the areas of improvement/suggestions would be in the trade and ceramics section, i'm not sure if there is a little bit information missing or just not added, I would say to include some sort of information there! Another thing would be that I believe there is not a need for a bibliography if there is a reference section, instead of listing out the links and references by numbers maybe change the bibliography into reference section and leave the number listing out. If my wording is a little confusing I would suggest looking how another wiki page looks like, one you can search up and is heavily reviewed, and look how their reference page is formatted. One last thing would be maybe to include a mini introduction or a little more description at the Later Ceramic Period section. Keep it going, you got this!