User:Alejandro1123/Late Ceramic Period (Kansas)/Q945E965 Peer Review

Peer Review from Easton Vogt:

3 Positives-


 * Your history section is well formatted and easy to read
 * The article also stays away from 'we' and 'our' words so it sounds official
 * The start of the bibliography also looks well organized

3 Areas of Improvement-


 * The introduction segment at the start might need a few more sentences to provide quick overview of subject
 * The European Contact section also needs more citations to back it up
 * Maybe add pictures to the side of the article for some character

3 Suggestions for Improvement-


 * Make sure to remove the heading for the primary intro section
 * Maybe put a post-contact subsection within the History portion just to show a full timeline
 * The subject of trade and daily hunting styles could also be worth your time to research as well

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)