User:AlejandroChavezUCSF/Delayed milestone/Shiva.jafaripour Peer Review

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Person A, Zunaira: Does the draft submission reflect a neutral point of view? (explain)

Person B, Shiva: Are the points included verifiable with cited secondary sources that are freely available? (explain)

yes, each point made is backed up with a reference that is from a credible source whether that is a research study, published paper, or information from an organization that provides information on the topic. I have reviewed all references to confirm this. No points made are left without a reference following it.

Person C, Jerril: Are the edits formatted consistent with Wikipedia’s manual of style? (explain)

Person: D, Sharon: Do the edits reflect language that supports diversity, equity, and inclusion? (explain)

Persons A, B, C and D: Do the group’s edits substantially improve the article as described in the Wikipedia peer review “Guiding framework”?

Zunaira:

Shiva:

Jerril:

Sharon:

Persons A, B, C and D: Has the group achieved its overall goals for improvement?

Zunaira:

Shiva:

Jerril:

Sharon: