User:Aleph65535/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Coracoid process

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article more or less at random as part of my training as TA for a wiki course. I picked an anatomy article because it's something I know about. I picked this article because it's early in the alphabet and I didn't want to scroll through a lot of entries. And I like the name. Coracoid = "like a raven's beak," from "Corvus" for crow.

Evaluate the article
The lead section is good: it concisely explains what the coracoid process is. It doesn't summarize the article's sections, though.

Content seems correct and up to date. Some of the text descriptions of this complex object are not entirely clear: anterior superior posterior inferior etc. More pictures would help a lot, particularly if labelled.

Tone/Balance seem fine.

References: at least one is provided for each section. So there don't seem to be many unsourced claims.

Organization is fine. Writing is clear and professional.

I would like to see more images. The shape of the coracoid process is complex. It should be visualized from multiple perspectives, particularly if it is described that way in the text. Without those images, you find yourself just thinking "I'll take your word for it, buddy" when you read the description.

Talk page is brief, focusing on homologs in other animals. Most of the rest of the content seems to be straightforward.

I would describe this article as good but short, missing only some more illustrations to flesh it out.