User:Aleutian06/Archive 2010-2011

Copyright problem: 39th Infantry Brigade Combat Team (United States)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as 39th Infantry Brigade Combat Team (United States), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.arkansas.gov/theproviders/39thpatch.html, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:39th Infantry Brigade Combat Team (United States) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, 39th Infantry Brigade Combat Team (United States), in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:39th Infantry Brigade Combat Team (United States) with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:39th Infantry Brigade Combat Team (United States). See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:39th Infantry Brigade Combat Team (United States) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Svick (talk) 15:27, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem: 39th Infantry Brigade Combat Team (United States)
Can I just delete the entire challange section until I can redevelope the information in a way that won't creat a copyright issue? Damon.cluck (talk) 17:15, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, I think that's okay and I have undid Bradjamesbrown's undo (he himself replied to you that he made a mistake, but he's right that you should use edit summary). You said on my talk page that you want to “redevelope the information from a different source”. The problem isn't what source you used, but how you used it. You can't just copy text from some webpage if its author doesn't agree with that. But you can use that page as a source of information, if you write them in your own words and you believe it's a reliable source. You should the cite that webpage. Svick (talk) 17:29, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Got it, thanks, If you look back I included as a See Also in the reference, The Flyer that the 39th Support Battalion Web site quoted. This was a document we put together for our 30th Anniversery and the 39th Support Battalion Site is actually quoting it. I think I have a more recient update of the same information that we did for the Brigades 39th Anniversery. Thanks for your help. New to all of this but enjoying learning. Trying to get a lot of information from 20 years of service in the Brigade capture before altimers sets in.Damon.cluck (talk) 17:39, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

39th infantory
You capitalized the d in deployment. Generally words in section titles are not capitalized unless they are a proper noun, or they are the first word in title. I have changed it back to small d. Happy editting. Feel free to talk back.  Hamza  [ talk ]  22:34, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Also you can check the This is a minor edit check box when editing to mark your particular edit for it didn't make any significant change to the article content.  Hamza  [ talk ]  22:35, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

206th Field Artillery Regiment
I must say that your contribs regarding US Army operations are very detailed. I was just going through your articles and following are some suggestions you may want to consider in your future edits
 * Kindly use small letters in section & sub-section titles with exception of names etc.
 * Put references in the section body rather than in section title. If your references corroborates multiple consecutive sentences, then you may add your reference at the end of last sentence it corroborates. If any other sentence in any other section can also be verified through this particular reference than you may want to use tag. Drop back a message on my talk page if you have any questions.  Hamza   [ talk ]  05:32, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, I have served 21 years in the 206th and the 39th BCT, including 2 tours in Iraq. One of my closest friends just retired with 43 years of service in the Regiment and his dad was with the same unit at the battle of Dutch Harbor, so it's kind of a labor of love.

I know I need to go back through and clean up the cites.

Are you familiar with the Create a Book option? Damon.cluck (talk) 05:55, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Company_E,_153rd_Infantry,_1941.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Company_E,_153rd_Infantry,_1941.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:14, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:16, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)
The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:11, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Coordinator elections have opened!
Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:37, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)
The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:32, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)
The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:13, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bibliography of Arkansas National Guard History


The article Bibliography of Arkansas National Guard History has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Wikipedia is not a directory to various sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 21:26, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Bibliography of Arkansas National Guard History
I have nominated Bibliography of Arkansas National Guard History, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Bibliography of Arkansas National Guard History. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 21:54, 14 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Per your request at the AFD, and per the clear consensus there, I've moved this article to User:Damon.cluck/Bibliography of Arkansas National Guard History. It can remain there as a resource, both for you and for the other editors working on the project. May I also suggest, though, that it might be useful information to pass along to either The Military History Wikiproject (of which you're a member, I see) or WikiProject Arkansas, if only as a link. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. Best, UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 14:37, 19 May 2010 (UTC)


 * ✅. Meant to remove that myself, but got side-tracked. Happening a lot today, maybe I need coffee or something. In any event, you should be set. Best, UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 19:45, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Signatures
Sign all of you posts on talk/discussion pages with four tildes (~), but do not use four tildes on the edit summary, just describe the changes you have made. (for example, I am signing with four tildes now→) Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 00:02, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

CMH edit

 * There are two new comments. Sadads (talk) 11:43, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)
The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:58, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

New Working group that might be useful
Hey, their is a new working group at WP:MILHIST that might interest you, WikiProject Military history/United States military history task force/Militias, Sadads (talk) 13:55, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:52, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

 * and again. Sadads (talk) 18:52, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * and again, Sadads (talk) 19:01, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Something for you
Thanks! My first Barnstar!Damon.cluck (talk) 12:52, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:103rd_Field_ARtillery_Regiment.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:103rd_Field_ARtillery_Regiment.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:56, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The image is from the U.S. Army Institute of Heraldry. I have added the appropriate template PD-USGov-Military-Army-USAIOH – US Army Institute of HeraldryDamon.cluck (talk) 02:14, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Damon.cluck (talk) 14:40, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Minor edits
You have been making some pretty major additions, e.g. this edit, and in the edit summary you have marked it as minor. This edit is certainly not minor, I would suggest either not hitting that button when you make such large edits or going to your user preferences and under the Editing tab unclick the box labeled "Mark all edits minor by default", Thanks, Sadads (talk) 13:07, 17 August 2010 (UTC)✅
 * Cool, Sadads (talk) 14:39, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:18, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Request for Copyedit on 39th Infantry Division
I've looked over your article. Spelling "Louisiana" and date formats were the most common issues. Diannaa may still look it over. More notes are on our request for copyedit page. Paulmnguyen (talk) 06:45, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

The Milhist election has started!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies  talk 21:29, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Arkansas Army National Guard, 1947 to Present
A tag has been placed on Arkansas Army National Guard, 1947 to Present, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your reasoning on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 18:00, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Delete it, it will take a few days before I am ready to move the article back to the mainspace--Damon.cluck (talk) 14:41, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Arkansas State Guard, 1876-1903
A tag has been placed on Arkansas State Guard, 1876-1903, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your reasoning on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 18:01, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Arkansas Territorial Militia 1804-1836
A tag has been placed on Arkansas Territorial Militia 1804-1836, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your reasoning on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 18:02, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

I concur. Delete it, it will take a few days before I am ready to move the article back to the mainspace--Damon.cluck (talk) 14:42, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Arkansas National Guard, 1903-1947
A tag has been placed on Arkansas National Guard, 1903-1947, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your reasoning on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 00:00, 18 September 2010 (UTC) Delete it, it will take a few days before I am ready to move the article back to the mainspace--Damon.cluck (talk) 14:42, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Arkansas State Militia, 1836-1876
A tag has been placed on Arkansas State Militia, 1836-1876, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your reasoning on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 06:00, 18 September 2010 (UTC)


 * I concur, Delete it, it will take a few days before I am ready to move the article back to the mainspace--Damon.cluck (talk) 14:43, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Arkansas National Guard Series


Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Cindamuse (talk) 13:37, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I have moved it to my userspace. Please delete it from the live side.  Sorry for the confusion.Aleutian06 13:51, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Spelling and capitalization award
Thanks very much. If you have any questions or concerns about my changes, or about other changes you think might be needed, let me know. Happy editing! Chris the speller (talk) 15:33, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Arkansas Militia
No problem, if you need anymore help please let me know! I did all the research for the Brooks-Baxter War article and several other Arkansas related topics, so I'm pretty well versed. I was planning on going over that article one more time because there are still a couple of conflicts I remember seeing with the research I had done. I would suggest looking at http://books.google.com I found several books on Arkansas history there recently made available. --The_stuart (talk) 15:40, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Any additions or corrections would be greatly appreciated. I am really trying to focus on the roll of the militia during the reconstruction conflicts.  Unfortunately, due to the Legislature abolishing the office of Adjutant General at the end of reconstruction, we (the state military department) have very few militia records from the period.Aleutian06 03:57, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Well done
Thanks!

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:17, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:12, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Re: Thanks for the help
Sorry I've been away from wikipedia for a while I guess you could say. Most of the sources for the article are freely available online. The Driggs thesis can be ordered though proquest 

Here I'd really suggest google books, there are several old books that are just encyclopedias of people, and I remember quite a few of them being soldiers.

I usually concentrate on politics, I would greatly appreciate you flushing out the militia history. I know the article is about a supposed "war" and yet there isn't much discussion about troops and battles and things. I know one thing that bothers me is that the Baxter men referred to themselves as "the Hallie Riflers" and the boat that was sunk in the Battle of Palarm was also named Hallie, and I haven't been able to determine if this is just a coincidence, and if not where that name came from. That's just one of many things I still haven't figured out.

As for getting it featured, that's just a tactic that I use to provoke critiques when I get stuck on an article and I need feedback to improve it. I doubt this article, being about southern post civil war politics, will ever be passable because it will never be unbiased enough. But I too find the reconstruction period to be incredibly interesting, I like studying politics in chaos. So it gives me an endless amount of things to do to research the BB War deeper and deeper.

--The_stuart (talk) 22:55, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

19-century military ranks
No, I can't find any good reference for what abbreviations were used in the 19th century. I am sure that the US Army's standard abbreviations were changed around the middle of the 20th century to all upper-case letters without a period, such as Capt. -> CAPT, Maj. -> MAJ, and so on. Perhaps you could find 19th-century military books on Google Books or elsewhere that could give you a some good examples. Sorry I can't provide more help. Happy editing! Chris the speller (talk) 00:09, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 15th (Josey's) Arkansas Infantry Regiment


A tag has been placed on 15th (Josey's) Arkansas Infantry Regiment requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 04:29, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Arkansas Militia
Yo! Done. Any questions, you know where to find me. Chris the speller (talk) 20:13, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 15:28, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 21:29, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 01:30, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

142nd Field Artillery Regiment (United States)
I gave it a once-over, will try to check it again more thoroughly. Chris the speller  yack  14:44, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I worked it over more thoroughly. You might want to check "Eurka Springs" and see if that shouldn't be "Eureka". The sentence "The units were poorly equipped and outdated equipment" was not very clear, and you probably know better than I what exactly was meant. I converted m-d-y style dates to d-m-y style, starting from World War I to the end, as there was a mix of styles, and WP:DATE says that modern US military usage is d-m-y. They don't say what year we went to 'modern'. If you want any earlier dates converted, I have the tools. I feel that m-d-y is better for the Civil War era. Happy editing! Chris the speller   yack  15:16, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:09, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011
To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:20, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:43, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Re:Autopatrolled
hi Damon, sorry about the confusion, i meant to let you know once it had been approved. as you've seen the defintion you probably realise by now its more for the benefit of the people who patrol new pages (of which i'm one). it does not mean the articles you create wont be checked or commented on by anyone, they will, it just means that because the qualtiy of your articles has been so good the new page patrollers dont need to worry about them. anyway, keep up the good work! cheers -- The Elves Of Dunsimore (talk) 01:34, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks!Aleutian06 (talk) 02:08, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

List of Arkansas Civil War Confederate units
Could you give me the link with the 48 units that you say are unassessed. Because the one's I've come across have been assessed. Adamdaley (talk) 07:53, 7 August 2011 (UTC)


 * I've looked at this article 3rd Regiment, Arkansas State Troops and left my feedback. Adamdaley (talk) 08:28, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I've looked at this article 2nd Arkansas Light Artillery and left my feedback. Adamdaley (talk) 09:14, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I guess I screwed this up in that when I dropped the templates on the talk pages, I actually copied an assessment.  I need to go back and take a look at that.  Sorry for the confusion.Aleutian06 (talk) 15:38, 7 August 2011 (UTC)


 * The 13th Arkansas Infantry Regiment article refers to the 15th Arkansas Infantry (Johnson's) (in the Battles Section) it is red-linked. Is that the same Infantry as the 15th Arkansas Infantry article? If they are the same then it can be linked directly. I'm not familiar with the ACW Infantries, Divisions, etc. Adamdaley (talk) 06:03, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I fixed it. Numbering of Arkansas ACW regiments is tricky because there were so many duplicates.  There were three (3) "15th Arkansas"s, four (4) if you count the Militia Regiment, so you really have to included the regimental commander it keep it all straight. Aleutian06 (talk) 17:56, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * At least you know what you are doing with the different, ACW regiments, divisions etc. I have no clue. Keep up the good work. There are more red-linked article's I'll tell you to do find for me so I can see if I can help anywhere. Adamdaley (talk) 00:05, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * With the "Organization" Section, I see you've put the people in charge of each section. Make sure that each Military rank is the same. For example "Lieutenant" maybe put as "Lt.", if another person has the same rank in another section it should be common to being consistent of such information throughout the article. Consistency should be maintained. Other than that, you're doing good with it. Adamdaley (talk) 06:23, 9 August 2011 (UTC)


 * With the 3rd Regiment, Arkansas State Troops in the "Organization" section would like to have a couple more sources:


 * At the beginning of the war, the Arkansas Succession Convention created the Provisional Army of Arkansas. The Provisional Army was to consist of two divisions: the 1st Division in the western part of the state was to be commanded by Brigadier General Pearce, and the 2nd Division in the eastern half of the state, commanded by Major General James Yell.[SOURCE NEEDED HERE] The intent of the Secession Convention was to transfer these state troop regiments into Confederate service as quickly as possible, to avoid the cost of paying for a large state army.[SOURCE NEEDED HERE] The troops of the eastern division were transferred to the command of Brigadier General Hardee in July 1861, but the troops of the western division under Brigadier General Pearce were not transferred to Confederate service before they became engaged in the Battle of Wilson's Creek.[SOURCE NEEDED HERE] The unit was composed of the following volunteer companies:[3]

Why? Because I'm going to do the "Class B" myself. WP:Arkansas doesn't seem to be moving very quickly under the Requesting Assessment section. If they don't like it then they can always revert my assessment. I'll keep doing my best to help you out. Adamdaley (talk) 07:44, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I added the references and an image of one of the companies. Thanks for the review!Aleutian06 (talk) 12:43, 19 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Look at the discussion page on this article: 2nd Arkansas Light Artillery - See if you can improve on it. Adamdaley (talk) 07:51, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Roger, this article needs a major over haul, but I have a little more work to do on infantry units before I move on to the KING OF BATTLE!Aleutian06 (talk) 12:51, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 21:47, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Flag of the 6th Arkansas, (Hardee Pattern).gif
Thanks for uploading File:Flag of the 6th Arkansas, (Hardee Pattern).gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:07, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 17:45, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Disabling indexing on articles
You added noindex to several pages, for example here. What was the purpose of this? Do you understand what it does? Gurch (talk) 08:43, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I have not intentionally used this tag, but I think I know how it may have gotten there. I have a file on my User Talk page called User:Damon.cluck/Arkansas Confederate Infantry Unit Histories, which is really just a shell that I have used to create unit pages for Arkansas Civil War Units.  It lets me copy and past the basic out line and a bunch of links and references that I have used repeatedly as I have created these pages.  I have had a couple of people edit this shell in my User Space by mistake, so I assume that one of them realized that they were working on a userspace article and added the noindex tab so it wouldn't happen again.  I probably copied the tag over as I created new unit history pages.  That or some one came behind me and added the tag, becaue I wasn't aware of it until you pointed it out.  Thanks!  Is there a bot or somthing that could remove that tag?  The articles that I may have unintentionally added it to are all listed on List of Arkansas Civil War Confederate units.Aleutian06 (talk) 12:30, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

6th Arkansas Infantry Regiment Article
Damon.cluck,

The only problem I have with the 6th Arkansas Infantry Regiment, is the lead paragraph. Could that be expanded by two or three lines of information? Then I'll assess it. Keep up the good work. Adamdaley (talk) 01:08, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Done!

2nd Arkansas Mounted Rifles
Damon.cluck,

Been talking to another Coordinator about the 2nd Arkansas Mounted Rifles. He's asked if you would have some time to log onto #freenode chat and go into a room called: #wikipedia-en-milhist ... That's a place where you can help from more people. While I'm more than willing to help you. Adamdaley (talk) 23:33, 29 September 2011 (UTC)


 * I have made minor fixes to the article and questions about some other information that is unclear to me. Adamdaley (talk) 08:32, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Certially willing to talk to anyone, but I am not familiar with #freenode Aleutian06 (talk) 12:42, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Damon.cluck - I was going over the article again, reading through it. I have a few questions.  Is "Company A — 1st Arkansas Mounted Rifles" the very same Company as "Company B — 1st Arkansas Mounted Rifles", if so could they point to the same article?  The same question applies too "Company C — 2nd Arkansas Mounted Rifles" and "Company D — 2nd Arkansas Mounted Rifles" and finally "Company H — 9th Arkansas Infantry" with "Company I — 9th Arkansas Infantry"? Is so, I can do those.  Adamdaley (talk) 23:13, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Regarding File:Governor Harris Flanigin.jpg
I have removed File:Governor Harris Flanigin.jpg which you added to 2nd Arkansas Mounted Rifles with this edit, because it does not have a valid non-free media use rationale for the article. Please see Non-free content criteria for the applicable policy and Non-free use rationale guideline if you want to address the issues. Thank you. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 11:26, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

1st Arkansas Infantry Regiment
I think this is B-class but I put it up on the assessment requests page to make sure. Good work. Wild Wolf (talk) 00:19, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Damon.cluck,
 * In the Infobox, you have the first reference what battle is that pointing too? The one above or the one that the reference is beside the battle?  Adamdaley (talk) 03:34, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I didn't create this article, but I think it is pointing to a PDF File that indicates that a 1st Arkansas Soldier was award the Confederate equilivant of the Medal of Honor for the action at Nashville. I will move the citation somewhere else.Aleutian06 (talk) 21:24, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 02:01, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 08:01, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:21, 27 December 2011 (UTC)