User:AlexKurtt/Zoospore/Rieboom Peer Review

General info
AlexKurtt
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:AlexKurtt/Zoospore
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Zoospore

Lead
The lead has been added to, refers to each of the subsequent sections, and is written concisely. The last sentence about infection in amphibians is not expanded on in the body of the article.

Content
A section on general morphology has been added and the section of zoosporangium has been extended. The added content is relevant and supplements the information currently present in the article.

Tone and Balance
The content added is neutral.

Sources and References
The sources added are current and reliable. Sources from the original article are missing. More sources might be added to explain, for example, the role of zoospores in the ecosystem or an example of infection in an organism.

Organization
The content added is written clearly and section headings make sense. I found only one grammatical error: the first sentence in the 'General Morphology' section is missing an "of".

Images and Media
There are no images or media.

Overall Impressions
The edits to this article add important information in a well-organized structure. More information (and sources) might be added to expand upon infection in amphibians and other ecological applications.