User:Alexa0406/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
I am evaluating the article Aztec Cuisine https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Aztec_cuisine&oldid=1148312224

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article to evaluate because I wanted to learn about something new while evaluating the article and because is something that is not really talked about now in days.

Evaluate the article
 Lead: 

I believe that it does describe the articles topic, it mentions about the Aztec cuisine and who it connected to back then. It does include major sections that will be in the article, but I think there was some things missing that are mentioned in the article. I believe it doesn’t include information that is not seen in the article. In the article there are the major part and I believe that the articles major content goes more in depth. I think it does go a little to in depth, I believe that they should point out the major parts and later on in the body paragraphs they should talk about the other things they wanted to talk about.

 Content: 

The article in many ways is related to the topic discussed about. What I know of is that it is up to date, the last time that this was edited on April 5, 2023. I believe that there is no content missing on the other hand I feel that it does have information that may not be required.

 Tone and Balance: 

I believe that the article was neutral. There was no position that made things biased in the article. I feel like many things were good in information but there was 1 or 2 subjects that were underrepresented and there was one thing overrepresented. Yes, they are accurately described in this article. It really isn’t a persuasive article to there is no persuading for any position.

 Sources and References: 

There are some sources that need citation (says in the article). Yes, there is a lot of sources that have even more backup information. No, not all the sources are current. Yes, there are many authors that have interacted with this article. Yes, there are many authors that have added historical peace’s to this article. Yes there might be better sources that have more accurate information over the Aztec cuisine. Yes, the sources/citation do work and have great information.

 Organization and Writing Quality: 

I believe that it is concise and it's easy to read. I had no troubles reading it. What I saw seemed grammatically correct and saw no spelling errors. Yes, this was one of the greatest things of the article. You can see each section and read it clearly.

 Images and Media: 

Yes, for example in all the foods they had images inserted to the word. So you can just hover over the word and the image pops up. Yes, the pictures had explanations at the bottom of them. Yes, they are all cited within Wikipedia. Yes, mostly because is something different that is seen for example, the gods that Aztec people served.

 Talk Page Discussion: 

It does not have current discussions and one of the old discussions was before this article was good as today. It says that it is a delisted Good Article. It appeared in the Wikipedia’s Main Page under the “Did you know?” column and it was in the Agriculture, food and drink good articles.

 Overall Impressions: 

I believe it is a delisted Good article. It is really good on having all the information that is related to the Aztec cuisine. But I think there was some information that should be cut because it sometimes went off topic. But this is a very well developed article, it was more than I asked for.

Overall this article was good and I learned new things that I hadn't heard of and I can say that I learned new things and relate to some of them.