User:Alexabowers/Philosophical zombie/T1xan15 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

KAlszko


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Alexabowers/Philosophical_zombie&action=edit


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Philosophical zombie

Evaluate the drafted changes
After reviewing this article I can say that the content added is relevant to the topic and is up to date. It feels like the added changes fit perfectly with article. The content is also neutral and doesn't have any bias positions. I did not find any sources tied to the information added. The book was mentioned, but wasn't included in the references. As mentioned before, the content added is well-written and clear to read. I did not find any grammatical or spelling errors in the changes added. No visual aid was added to the article which can help with comprehension. In general, I feel like the content added improved the overall quality of the article and made it more complete. There is still some things that should be added and improved (like sources and visual aid), but it's a great start.

(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)